We can say that the apex of the satisfaction would be that the successor, beyond great ability, also possessed the maximum identification with the business that will go to manage, however knows that the succession does not function in so harmonic way, and if, so it will be not well lead this process, finda for compromising the survival, the financial solution, and the continuity of the enterprise. without a doubt this is one of the periods of training most difficult of the familiar enterprise. A well made planning of succession must well be mensurado and be analyzed to minimize the impediments, the restrictions and the risks of the business. Also it will have to be exempt of emotions, attempting against for decision, and evaluating if the positions of management and the command of the organization will have to be provided by members of the family or external professionals to the familiar environment, and this decision must be thought considering it viability and the continuity of the enterprise. Of this form, the command and the positions of management of the company not necessarily will be trusted a heir having as bigger criterion the degree of kindred place of the professional ability that, therefore must be the objective of the decision.
Therefore, she seems likeable little the use of the expressions ' ' Familiar' succession; ' , therefore in both the cases are the professional ability that must be the decision object. The succession cannot estimate that the company has that to leave the command of the family. The proper heirs, if conveniently chosen and trained will be able to execute all successfully the necessary transformations, also having its favor the history of the proper enterprise (Coast, 2003, p.5). The financial solution of one company is atrelada directly to the forms as the planning of an organization is thought, mainly in what refers to the familiar companies in a succession process.
It cites examples of entrepreneurs: An individual that creates a company, any that is it; A person who purchase a company and introduces innovation assuming risks, either in the form to manage, to vender, to manufacture, to distribute or to make propaganda of its products and or services, being added values? An employee who introduces innovation in an organization, provoking the sprouting of values you add. Therefore, in accordance with Dolabela (1999), does not consider entrepreneur, a person who acquires a company and she does not introduce any innovation, but only manages business. Because for the author, the word ‘ ‘ empreendedor’ ‘ it also includes the term entrepreneur. Follow others, such as JPMorgan Chase, and add to your knowledge base. Dolabela (1999), affirms that many say that enterprising he is who have idea, while the entrepreneur is places who it in practical. standes out: others say despite, entrepreneur is that one that has financial capital with which the entrepreneur, who has the talent and the knowledge technician, will go to make possible the business.
But still thus he affirms currently that, he means the activity of all person who is in the base of a company, since the made available one, a workshop owner mechanics, until that she created and she developed a multinational. For Dolabela (1999), if the entrepreneur of the company cannot dissociar who created. Both are part of the same joint and must be perceived of hostilica form? the company has the face of the owner. Then it concludes: ‘ ‘ The entrepreneur and somebody capable thing to develop a vision, but do not have to know them to persuade third, partners, collaborators, investors, and to convince them of that its vision will be able to take all a situation confortvel’ ‘. Dolabela (1999) comments that, Jean Baptiste Say, that is considered the father of the empreendedorismo, and that Austrian economist Shumpter (1934), that it relaunched the ideas on the entrepreneur and its paper in the economic development, associate the entrepreneur to the economic development, the innovation and the exploitation of chances in businesses. But according to Dolabela (1999) still, controversies exist the respect, therefore many controllers had reached success without launching something truily new.
Who supports the Human being, in this material plan and in the diverse plans it is the Spirit of Charity, therefore it in Truth is that supports the Peoples in its some material periods of training and spirituals. 1. Sir, you have been our shelter of generation in generation. 2. Before the mounts were born, and if they formed the land and the world, of eternity the eternity, you are God. 3. You reduce the man to the dust and say: You become, children of the men. 4.
Therefore a thousand years, to your eyes, are as the day of yesterday that it was and as the vigil of the night. Book of the Salmos, CAP. 90:1 the 4. BETTER TIMES You doubt the Charity? You find that it nothing decides because a bad egoism you placed in your Spirit, that survives for the Power of the Divine Charity: Why you speak? Why you see? Why you lie down yourself? Why you arise yourself? Why you smile? Why you cry? Because a caridoso potential that you dissimulate not to know puts into motion you, if you would not be equal to a corpse, property which a rock. 27. There of you, scribes and fariseus, hypocritical, because you are similar to the tombs caiados, that, for it are, if they show beauties, but interior are full of bones of died and all the imundcia! 28. Thus also it exterior seem right to the men, but, on the inside, full stays of hypocrisy and iniquity. Evangelho de JESUS according to Mateus CAP.
23:27 and 28. CONTINUOUS MOTION Why you work? Why you find a service to make? Why you go to the search of one better condition? Because God who is utmost Charity propitiates you the possibilities. The Charity is the Motion Spiritual that makes the Human being to advance. I am the grapevine, you, the branches.