This scene brings about chaos instances, but not of any type, but of the most particular model, chaos controlentrpico" , that one that is caused and administered by the being controller, the State, in specific dosages, whose dosage administers different gubernativas organizations and from State when they are themselves put under an autocratic and messianic Executive authority. They are the two social aspects that they identify to present Venezuela at this time when the postulates of the Fifth Republic, still without consolidating in the imaginary group, hit a latest bolivariana socialist revolution named Of the 21st century now ". First of them it is the instability. The public and deprived institutions of Venezuela, with all imaginary ones, their hopes of growth and their historical and cultural referring past as are subject to the contingency of the unforeseen circumstance, the sinisterness and the egoisms that motorize plus the spirits and the exhortativo car of a messianic leader, who the transcendental thing that emanates of the group. We are, not to doubt, in a division that it classifies to us like citizens of first or second, which it divides between patriotas" to us; and esculidos" , and that simultaneously blurs to us like State, turning to us into fragile and dependent citizens before what it goes beyond the horizon immediate. Peculiarly, it is not the modern rupture social, that specifies the following industrial sociologists of the doctrines of Weber. We are in the presence of the rupture of the social epithelial weave that disables to the citizens the reconstruction of a whole, called project country; that it inhibits them to think about systems social alternating and them restrains so that they tie complementarily, in interrelation of ideas that leads towards associated conception of future, that is not other than the possible Venezuela and of truly democratic opportunities, in that all we dreamed to live.